National Review Watch: Krauthammer

To-day’s sample from the National Review is an article by Charles Krauthammer called “Iraq’s choice.” I chose this article because I am familiar with Krauthammer as one of the most hawkish of pundits yet also one of the most intelligent. I find his arguments are usually well laid out and are not typical of many conservative pundits, especially those published by the National Review. This article is consistent with my take on Krauthammer.

Where many would have blamed ‘liberals’ for treasonous disrespect to the US, Krauthammer merely disagrees with Zakaria. Krauthammer’s argument is that the US did not bring Iraq a civil war, rather some Iraqis chose this course of action. Krauthammer admits some mistakes on the US’s part, but those mistakes did not necessitate such a response.

There are not any sweeping claims. Rather I find this article to be a sober assessment whose only crime is that it resides in a literature base usually containing unsupported sweeping claims.

One thought on “National Review Watch: Krauthammer

  1. richnodul

    Good article, even a few years later. Just started reading some Krauthammer – and the cultivated but cynic/realist style is refreshing. I find him a straight-forward man, with a down-to-earth perspective on human nature and free from fantasies and wishful thinking.

    Thanks for the tip!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *